Legal Opinion

Smith v. Schlink

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 4, 1908No. 5663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. Samuel L. Caepbetteb, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbebt

The subject-matter of controversy is lot number twenty-nine, Case and Ebert’s Addition to the City of Denver. The case has an extended history, as will be learned from the opinion in Smith v. Schlink, 15 Colo. App. 325; 62 Pac. 1046, where is given in detail a statement relative to the contention over the lot involved. Prom this statement it appears, that Schlink recovered a judgment against Smith, which was afterwards affirmed by the court of appeals, and that' on tills judgment an execution was sued out and levied on property which included the lot in question. In due course, a sheriff’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. SchlinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Smith v. SchlinkColorado Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morris v. CheneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API