Legal Opinion

Smith v. Schlink

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1908No. 5663PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to the Denver District Court. Hon. Booth M. Malone, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

Plaintiffs in error, having been found guilty of contempt of court and fined, prosecute this writ of error to reverse the judgment in the contempt proceedings.

*201The first chapter of this litigation, in the appellate courts of this state, is written in Smith v. Schlink, 15 Col. App. 325. It was there held that the plaintiff below, in dismissing that part of his complaint sounding in damages, eliminated therefrom all allegations which stated a cause of action upon which any proof could be made, or on which any decree quieting title or granting a permanent injunction could be granted; and for that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Horn v. ReitlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. Newman v. BullockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  3. People ex rel. Du Bois v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. District Court in & for Weld CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Civil Service Commission v. CarneySupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
  5. In Re ValterzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API