Legal Opinion

Smith v. Schlink

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1900No. 1838PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of A rapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.

Whether we consider the interests of the public or the interests of the parties, we must regret our inability to affirm this judgment. The plaintiff has got nothing to which he might not be able to establish his title under proper conditions, and the defendants are prohibited nothing to which they have any apparent claim, yet the record does not warrant the judgment. A decree was entered which cannot be sustained on the bill. We shall dismiss all matters antecedent to the amended complaint. When it was filed it necessarily took the place of all prior pleading by the plaintiff and became the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wall v. MagnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morris v. CheneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Lowe v. SorySupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  3. Smith v. ARGENT MORTG. CO., LLC.District Court, D. Colorado · 2006
  4. Smith v. ARGENT MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC.District Court, D. Colorado · 2006
  5. Smith v. SchlinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API