Legal Opinion

Weimeister v. Manville

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1880PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Mason. Garnishment. The garnishee brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

In this case the facts are the same as in the case of the same garnishee as plaintiff in error against Singer and Benedict, except that in the present case the suit against the principal debtor is alleged to be pending in the Mason circuit court. There are, however, some peculiarities about the proceedings which may projoerly be referred to, that are not found in the other case so distinctly.

By referring to the amendatory act of 1879 it will be found among other things to have changed the requisites of garnishee process in these particulars from the old statute. It provides for actions on…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Iron Cliffs Co. v. LahaisMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. W. H. Warner Coal Co. v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Ettelsohn v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Coe v. HinkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Carter v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API