Legal Opinion

Gilliam v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 20, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01047Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * CHELSEA GILLIAM, et al., * * Plaintiff, * * Civ. No. MJM-23-1047 v. * * DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC * SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL * SERVICES, et al., * * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Chelsea Gilliam, Kennedy Holland, and Chloe Grey (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are three transgender women who were previously or are presently incarcerated in correctional facilities operated by the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (“DPSCS”). Plaintiffs filed this civil action against DPSCS…

2Cases cited115 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API