Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pinney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

The Subsidiary High Court of the' Nnited States of the Ancient Order of Foresters is a. voluntary association, composed of delegates from district or from subordinate courts, and is organized for the-mutual benefit of the members of the order, and for benevolent purposes. It possesses the general legislative power of the order, and is supreme authority for organizing district and subordinate courts. It holds biennial sessions, commencing on the second Tuesday in August. There is an executive council, which is composed of the officers of the subsidiary high court, whose duties and functions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Final v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Hutchinson v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Bullard v. President of the Nantucket BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zeilman v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Enright v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Robinson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Van Allen v. SpragueMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Stanton v. Estey Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API