Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Donovan, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action to recover damages-for an alleged breach of contract. Plaintiff was the owner of an excavator or shovel operated by steam power, and the evidence in his behalf shows that defendant contracted, to pay him eight cents per cubic yard for as much gravel as he should load aboard cars to be furnished by defendant during the season of 1887, and that defendant agreed to furnish 100 cars per day to be loaded. The testimony shows that plaintiff has received pay for loading the dirt actually hauled, so that the only questions involved are-those relating to the alleged damages which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGregor v. Estate of RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Smith v. PinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McKernan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. West v. BechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Schnepf v. Thomas L. McNamara, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lucy v. DowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API