Legal Opinion

Enright v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff sues as administratrix *241of the estate of James Enright. The action is based upon a contract of insurance made between the defendant company and the Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Company, and upon a certificate issued as supplemental to the contract directly to Enright. The contract between the two companies is in the form of an open policy of insurance, by the terms of which the insurance company insured the railroad company from month to month,—

“Covering such of its officers and employés as shall be entered in a schedule, and shall duly pay the premiums therein…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. PinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Peet v. Great Camp of the Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. McKayWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Rasmussen v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fisher v. United States Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  4. Van Allen v. SpragueMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Newton v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API