Legal Opinion
Varacalli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 19, 1990No. 2:90-cv-71361PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HACKETT, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed suit seeking to have this court declare one of the defendants primarily responsible for the medical costs she incurred as the result of an automobile accident which occurred on May 14, 1989. Plaintiff was insured under a no-fault policy by defendant State Farm and is also insured by the federal Medicare program. The defendants have filed cross motions for summary judgment.
STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) empowers the court to render summary judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Rhode Island Insurers' Insolvency FundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Guadalupe Caldera v. Ins Co. of the State of PACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Denekas v. ShalalaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1996
- Larry Dean Speegle v. Harris Methodist Health System and Harris Methodist Fort Worth, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- United States v. GeierDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.