Legal Opinion
United States v. Geier
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 9, 1993No. 92-C-0593-CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
CRABB, Chief Judge.
This is a civil action for declaratory and monetary relief brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345 and 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b). Presently before the court is plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff contends that the United States’ claim of recovery is paramount to defendant Hartford Insurance Company’s subrogated interest in the judgment awarded defendant Geier against a third party tortfeasor for medical expenses incurred as a result of an automobile accident. Defendant Hartford Insurance Company argues that its subrogation rights derive from its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Indiana Grocery, Inc. v. Super Valu Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fanning v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. FrugeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Filippi v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. ForkeyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.