Espinosa v. Roswell Tower, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
1. Roswell Tower, Inc. (RTI) appeals, and the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) cross-appeals, from penalties and costs awarded against RTI for nuisance and regulatory and statutory violations resulting from asbestos removal at the Petroleum Building (the building) in Roswell, New Mexico.
2. On appeal, Appellants challenge all penalties imposed and the sufficiency of the evidence to support findings that justify the penalties. On cross-appeal, NMED challenges the amount of statutory penalties imposed, and certain findings relevant to the issue. We affirm the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of Estate of HeeterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sanchez v. ClaytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Sanchez v. ClaytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Titus v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- New Mexico v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2004
- Espinosa v. Roswell Tower, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Kiehne v. N.M. Dep't of Game & FishNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2026
- Titus v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.