Faust v. STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
Certiorari upon the relation of Group Health Plan, Inc., intervenor, and Carol Faust, employee of respondent employer, State of Minnesota, to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board (now the Worker's Compensation Court of Appeals) denying benefits for an injury employee sustained during the lunch hour. We reverse.
Employee works for the Department of Revenue at the Centennial Office Building, which fronts on Cedar Street just south of the Capitol. The main entrance to the building is in the middle of the building. Opposite the building and across Cedar Street is a large…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jewel Companies, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Goff v. Farmers Union Accounting Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Lassila v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
3Cited by8 opinions
- Foley v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Merrill v. J. C. PenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Satack v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Faust v. STATE DEPT. OF REVENUESupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.