Legal Opinion
State v. Tanberg
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 12, 2004No. 51961-1-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
87 P.3d 788 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Shaun Paul TANBERG, Appellant.
No. 51961-1-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
April 12, 2004.
Thomas Michael Kummerow, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Seth Aaron Fine, Snohomish County Prosecutor's Office, Everett, WA, for Respondent.
Published in Part Opinion
COLEMAN, J.
Double jeopardy protects persons from multiple punishments for the same crime. The key consideration in analyzing a double jeopardy claim is to determine what punishment the legislature intended. In making this determination, courts employ the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BresolinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State Of Washington v. Shelly ArndtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017