Legal Opinion

State v. Freeman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2005No. Nos. 74656-7; 74861-6PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 “No person shall be . . . twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.” Const, art. I, § 9; accord U.S. Const, amend. V. With the increasing proliferation of criminal statutes, the same criminal conduct might violate multiple statutes. Because of this, courts must determine whether and, if so, when, convicting a defendant of several different crimes based on the same conduct violates double jeopardy. This largely turns on whether the legislature intended to punish the conduct as separate crimes or to punish the conduct as a single, “higher” felony.

Chambers, J.

¶2 In both of the cases before…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API