Legal Opinion

In re Accutane Litig.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 1, 2018No. A-25 September Term 2017; 079958PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA

**346*563At issue in this appeal involving a civil mass tort action is the admissibility of scientific evidence under the New Jersey Rules of Evidence.

Plaintiffs claim that a causal connection exists between Accutane, a prescription drug used in the treatment of nodular acne, and Crohn's disease, a chronic gastrointestinal illness. Litigation in New Jersey over Accutane's side effects has spanned more than a decade. This action is a continuation in that series of litigated matters. Since those actions first commenced in New Jersey in 2005, a number of epidemiological studies have been…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  2. State v. CassidySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  3. IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF A.Y. SVP-545-09 (ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  4. 83 WILLOW AVENUE APARTMENTS, LLC VS. 83 WILLOW, LLC (L-2903-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  5. ATLANTIC CITY SOUVENIR & SNACKS, INC. VS. PARKER MCCAY (L-0086-15, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API