Legal Opinion

Setzer v. Dunlap

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1974No. 7418DC717PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The defendant assigns as error the action of the trial judge in setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial.

Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 59(a) (6), a judge may grant a new trial to any party on the grounds that inadequate damages were awarded which appear to have been given under the influence of passion or prejudice. A motion in this regard is directed to the sound discretion of the trial judge and it is established that “[w]hile the necessity for exercising this discretion, in any given case, is not to be determined by the mere inclination of the judge, but by a sound and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Settee v. Charlotte Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Goldston v. ChambersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lazenby v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Hanna v. BradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Overton v. PurvisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Howard v. MercerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Haas v. KelsoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API