Legal Opinion

Geary v. Bangs

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1891PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— • heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This was a suit in assumpsit, brought by Paul Bangs against John B. Geary, to recover a balance claimed to be due from the defendant to the plaintiff for work and labor performed and materials furnished by the plaintiff in the erection of a building for the defendant. The declaration consists of the indebitatus assumpsit counts and also a count alleging a special agreement in writing between the plaintiff and defendant, dated June 12, 1888, by which the plaintiff agreed to do all the carpenter work and furnish all the lumber and mill-work necessary on said building, and also the roof,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joliet, Aurora & Northern Railway Co. v. VelieIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. MorgensternIllinois Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fred W. Wolf Co. v. Monarch Refrigerating Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Rhodius v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Howard T. Fisher & Associates, Inc. v. Shinner Realty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  4. Matson v. PoncinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Beezley v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API