Legal Opinion

Hanks v. Anderson

District Court, D. Utah

Decided September 5, 2024No. 2:19-cv-00999Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH NATHAN W. HANKS and REALSOURCE MEMORANDUM DECISION EQUITY SERVICES, LLC, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART [330] NATHAN W. HANKS’ Plaintiffs/Crossclaim Defendant, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST MICHAEL ANDERSON’S v. INDEMNIFICATION CROSSCLAIM MICHAEL S. ANDERSON, Case No. 2:19-cv-00999 Defendant/Crossclaim Plaintiff. District Judge David Barlow Before the court is Plaintiff Nathan Hanks’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Michael Anderson (“Mike Anderson”)1 on his Indemnification Crossclaim.2 Having reviewed the briefing and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Bixler v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API