Legal Opinion
Edelstein v. Toyota Motors Distributors
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 23, 1980PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
176 N.J. Super. 57 (1980)
422 A.2d 101
BENJAMIN EDELSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
TOYOTA MOTORS DISTRIBUTORS AND TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 7, 1980.
Decided October 23, 1980.
Before Judges MATTHEWS, MORGAN and MORTON I. GREENBERG.
Benjamin Edelstein argued the cause pro se (Edelstein & Edelstein, attorneys).
Dana C. Argeris argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents (Carton, Nary, Witt & Arvanitis, attorneys).
Norbert T. Knapp, on the brief, for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marder v. Realty Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Marder v. Realty Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Herbstman v. Eastman Kodak CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ventura v. Ford Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Gochey v. Bombardier, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Slowinski v. Valley Nat. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Ramirez v. AutosportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Fode v. Capital RV Center, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.