Legal Opinion
McKamey v. Vander Houten
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided October 19, 1999No. Civil Action 99C-02-133-JOHPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLIHY, Judge.
Claiming that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over them, the defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint. The basis of their argument is that the alleged underlying tort action occurred in Maryland, that they are Florida residents and that they have no real connection to Delaware.
Plaintiff Edwin N. McKamey, Jr., 1 a Delaware resident, was injured while driving his truck in Maryland when it was struck by another truck operated by defendant Robert J. Vander Houten, a Florida resident. He was driving for defendant Rhonda Matteson d/b/a A.R. Gamez…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sternberg v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Mary M. Knowlton v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., and Schick Movers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Outokumpu Engineering Enterprises, Inc. v. Kvaerner EnviroPower, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1996
- Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Waters v. Deutz Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brinkmann v. Adrian Carriers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Wright v. American Home Products Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 2000
- Chick v. C & F ENTERPRISES, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Kee v. Blue Line Distributing, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Ciabattoni v. EbySuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.