Walker v. Crosby
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Exum Walker appeals the district court’s dismissal of his application for writ of habeas corpus, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, as time-barred under the one-year statute of limitations contained in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). We granted a certificate of appealability as to the following issues: (1) whether individual claims within a single habeas petition may be reviewed separately for timeliness in light of Artuz v. Bennett, 581 U.S. 4, 121 S.Ct. 361, 148 L.Ed.2d 213 (2000); and (2) whether,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Nevin G. Sweger, Jr. v. Joseph W. Chesney District Attorney of the County of Cumberland Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Anthony Fielder v. Benjamin Varner the District Attorney of County of Philadelphia Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Destinni Mardesich v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Ferreira v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.