Huntley v. Chicago Board of Options Exchange
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge.
This putative class action concerns allegations that Defendant Chicago Board of Options Exchange (“CBOE”) is listing, and Defendant The Options Clearing Corporation (“OCC”) is clearing, stock options that *1372they know may become worthless after a reverse stock split. Defendants filed a Motion to Transfer Venue [Doc. 24] to the Northern District of Illinois, along with a supporting Memorandum. (Doc. 24-1) (“Def.’s Mem.”) For the reasons stated in this Order, the Motion is GRANTED.
I. DISCUSSION.
28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) states that a district court may transfer a civil…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- William S. Manuel v. Convergys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- William B. Scheidt and Wanda C. Scheidt v. William Randolph KleinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Tischio v. Bontex, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Van Howell v. Joe D. Tanner, Individually and as Commissioner of Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anthony Hughes v. Truist Bank, Inc.; Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co.; and The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2026
- Drake v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021
- Drake v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
- Engineered Floors, LLC v. Lakeshore Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021
- Engineered Floors, LLC v. Lakeshore Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.