Legal Opinion

Hume v. City of Amarillo

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1937No. 6771PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge HICKMAN

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

*426The Court of Civil Appeals has correctly decided this case. Its opinion is reported in 70 S. W. (2d) 651. The writ of error was granted because of a conflict between its decision and the decisions of certain other courts of civil appeals. We here now resolve that conflict in favor of the holding of the Amarillo court herein. Chief Justice Hall has written a clear and forceful opinion. Any writing which we might do on the subject would add nothing thereto, and we, therefore, adopt and make our own the following…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Fisher v. L. E. Whitham & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BlairTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Scanlan v. Gulf Bitulithic Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. City of Ft. Worth v. Capps Land Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keller v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Root v. Texas Bitulithic CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. City of Alvin v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API