Legal Opinion
Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Foster
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 19, 1932No. 3889PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The respective parties in this case will carry the same designation as in the trial court.
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant and allegéd certain bodily injuries received in the course of his employment, which he alleges were due to the negligence of defendant and its agents.
The particular portion of his pleading that we deem necessary to quote here is as follows : “It is shown that at the time and place above alleged, defendant was then having unloaded from its cars and stacked on such premises certain switch ties, all freshly ereosoted and each weighing from seven hundred to one thousand…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. HillebrandtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. EdwardsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Russell v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harris v. Thornton's Department StoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Kasch v. AntonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Richards v. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Ferguson Seed Farms, Inc. v. Fort Worth & D., S. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- City of Brownwood v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.