Legal Opinion
Brophy v. Sterling Engineered Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1991No. 36-3_4UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
940 F.2d 1533
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Lawrence E. BROPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STERLING ENGINEERED PRODUCTS INC., Defendant-Appellee.
1
No. 90-55147.
2
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 5, 1991.
Decided Aug. 6, 1991.
3
Before SCHROEDER and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and KING,* District Judge.
4
MEMORANDUM**
5
At…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- John Pochiro and Karen Pochiro, Husband and Wife v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Campen (Sally M.), Finn (Anne v. , Jessen (Christopher), Jett (Wayne), Developak, Inc. v. Hubert (Edwin G.), Greenamyer (Darryl G.), Greenamyer Engineering & Technology, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Campen (Sally M.), Finn (Anne v. , Jessen (Christopher), Jett (Wayne), Developak, Inc. v. Hubert (Edwin G.), Greenamyer (Darryl G.), Greenamyer Engineering & Technology, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991