Legal Opinion
Campen (Sally M.), Finn (Anne v. , Jessen (Christopher), Jett (Wayne), Developak, Inc. v. Hubert (Edwin G.), Greenamyer (Darryl G.), Greenamyer Engineering & Technology, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1991No. 89-56050PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
940 F.2d 1533
Campen (Sally M.), Finn (Anne V.), Jessen (Christopher),
Jett (Wayne), Developak, Inc.
v.
Hubert (Edwin G.), Greenamyer (Darryl G.), Greenamyer
Engineering & Technology, Inc.
NOS. 89-56050, 89-56057
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
AUG 05, 1991
1
Appeal From: C.D.Cal.
2
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brophy v. Sterling Engineered Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scd Rma, LLC v. Farsighted Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2008
- Brophy v. Sterling Engineered Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Davidson v. PaigeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
- Produce Pay, Inc. v. Agrosale, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
- Skatteforvaltningen v. The Goldstein Law Group PC 401(K) Profit Sharing PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.