Legal Opinion
Ostrem v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 6, 1982No. 5790PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Curtis Ostrem’s land lay in the path of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. For $11,988 he sold Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. [Alyeska] an easement over a 6.6 acre parcel of his land. By the terms of the easement, Alyes-ka had the right:
“to ... construct, lay, maintain, operate, use, inspect, repair, remove, change the size of and replace one pipe line and appurtenances thereto ... and to construct, lay, erect, maintain, operate, use, inspect, renew, add to and remove roads, electrical and/or communication lines and cables (both above and underground) and poles with all incidental equipment...
Aly…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Armstrong v. Francis Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- State, Department of Highways v. CrosbyAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Hughett v. Caldwell CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
- Ossman v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Wernberg v. Matanuska Electric AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Dixon v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Pankratz v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Hostler v. Green Park Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State of Alaska v. 13.90 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.