ARCHEY v. PURDUE
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CHARLES ARCHEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:19-cv-03541-SEB-MPB ) MS. PURDUE, ) MR. KING, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiff Charles Archey, a state prisoner, alleges that Defendants NP Elaine Purdue and Mr. Michael King violated his Eighth Amendment rights when they stopped his insulin shots. Dkt. 10. Defendants dispute this claim and seek summary judgment. Mr. Archey did not respond. Because there is no evidence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tyrone Petties v. Imhotep CarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Julian J. Miller v. Albert GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Skiba v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.