Legal Opinion

Gerber Ex Rel. Gerber v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 16, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, P. J.

Rule 15 of this court requires that the brief of appellant shall contain, among other things,'“a fair and concise statement of the facts of the case without reiteration, statements of law, or argument.” As a compliance with that requirement appellant in this case has made the following statement:

“On October 7, 1919, the W. D. Boyle Construction Company entered into a written contract with appellant, Kansas City, Missouri, to construct a district sewer in Kansas City, Missouri, in accordance with certain plans and specifications then on file in the office of the Board of Public Works of said…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Wiggin v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Clark v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hoelzel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Neal v. Curtis & Co. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Hanson v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Central Surety & Insurance v. HintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Treon v. City of HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API