Legal Opinion

In re Robertshaw

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 4, 1935No. 3561PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Garrett, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Tbe immediate question bere involved grows out of a petition for remand of the above styled case to the Patent Office, as hereinafter set forth.

An application for patent by appellant, relating to improvement in valves, was finally rejected, for lack of invention over prior art cited, by tbe Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office on July 24, 1933. Appeal was duly taken to the Board of Appeals and on June 21, 1934, the latter tribunal affirmed the action of the examiner.

Thereafter appeal was taken to this court and a certified…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roemer v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Realty Acceptance Corp. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Harper Bros. v. KlawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. Wagner v. MeccanoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  5. Greene v. United Shoe Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Application of Raymond P. FischerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Richard C. Loshbough v. Kenneth C. AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API