Legal Opinion

Grand View Building Ass'n v. Northern Assurance Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1905No. 13,617PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Edward P. Holmes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ames, C.

The Grand View Building Association, a corporation, hereinafter called the association, obtained a policy of fire insurance upon chattel property belonging to it, from the Northern Assurance Company of London, England, hereinafter called the insurance company, or the company. The policy contained a clause declaring that it should be void if concurrent insurance should be obtained without the consent of the company in writing indorsed thereon. *150Concurrent insurance was obtained, without such written consent, and on June 1, 1898, the property was totally destroyed by fire. On the 30th of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Bunch v. GraveIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  4. State v. Bank of CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Baldwin v. BurtNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. of London v. Grand View Building Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. People's Fire Insurance v. GoyneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Royal Insurance v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Shepard v. City of FriendNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Leisen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API