Legal Opinion

Bridgeport Coalition for Fair Representation v. City of Bridgeport

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 25, 1994No. 1592, Docket 93-9254PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge:

The City of Bridgeport, Connecticut, appeals the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction prohibiting it from conducting city elections under its 1993 reapportionment plan. The court found that the plaintiffs, a coalition of minority rights advocates, were likely to succeed on their claim that the City violated section 2 of the Voting Rights Act1 by diluting minority voting opportunities in reapportioning its City Council electoral districts on May 27, 1993. Its order required the City to adopt a redistricting plan designed to achieve balanced voting…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. Nixon v. Kent CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Rodriguez v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. Deere & Co. v. MTD Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  5. Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting CommissionDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API