State v. Cate
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Defendant, having waived a jury, was convicted by the court of illegal possession of narcotics. ORS 474.020. He appeals, and assigns as error denial of his motion to suppress evidence.
The evidence of the police officer alone was sufficient to establish the following:
During business hours on the morning of July 8, 1970, Oregon State Police Officer Veteto had occasion to telephone Mrs. Margaret Whitsell about certain matters unrelated to this charge. During that conversation Mrs. Whitsell asked Officer Veteto to meet her. Concerning that meeting, Officer Veteto testified:
“* * * I didn’t know…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. HuddlestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Lenahan v. LeachOregon Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MacOmberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972