Legal Opinion
State v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 4, 1972No. 40298; 40299PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangtey, J.
Defendants in this consolidated appeal were jointly tried and convicted, in a trial to the court, for illegal possession of heroin. Former OES 475.100. Their assignments of error are: (1) their motion to suppress should have been granted; (2) the court erred in permitting evidence of other crimes; and (3) there was insufficient evidence that they possessed the heroin.
Motion to Suppress
The heroin which defendants were charged with possessing was seized by a probation officer from the apartment of one Gary Cox, a probationer under his supervision. The probation officer, Nicholas Nathe,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- U. S. Ex Rel. Lombardino v. HeydDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- State v. OareOregon Supreme Court · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CulbertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- United States Ex Rel. Coleman v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1975
- State v. CortezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.