Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 23, 1970PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

Defendant was indicted, tried and convicted by a jury of forcible rape. He appeals from the resulting judgment, asserting three assignments of error. We will consider them seriatim.

The first arises out of a denial of a motion for mistrial made because of a question asked on cross-examination by the prosecutor of the defendant. During the defendant’s case-in-chief he called as a witness a woman with whom he was living at the time of the commission of the crime. She testified she was not married to the defendant, had permitted him to move into her apartment, and that she had borne him two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. RaderOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. SteffesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. HafnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. State v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API