State v. Butler
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurrence
CONCURRING OPINION OP
LEVINSON, J.
I concur in the result reached by the majority. I believe, however, that the issues raised in this case are of *187sufficient importance to merit further discussion.
Before proceeding, in fairness to the prosecution, I am compelled to fill in an egregious omission from the majority’s statement of the facts. The effigy apparatus did not consist simply of two undifferentiated man-size figures hanging from a crossbar as the court’s opinion implies. On the contrary, the effigies were very provocative in nature. One effigy, dressed in a cowboy hat and boots and labeled…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gregory v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Katherine Idell Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.