Legal Opinion

Town of Medford Ex Rel. Fuss v. Early

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 28, 1944No. Nos. 31158-31161PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Under 11 O. S. 1941 § 107, this action is prosecuted in the name of the town of Medford by J. H. Fuss, holder of street improvement bonds issued by said town, to foreclose the lien of special improvement assessments against numerous lots in the town. The assessments involved being delinquent for more than twelve months and having been based upon the original assessing ordinance of 1927. The causes of action, defendants named, and defenses asserted are various and numerous.

Upon trial the plaintiff was given some partial relief, but in the main the judgment went against plaintiff. On appeal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Service Feed Co. v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. McGrath v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Davis v. McCaslandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hynds v. City of Ada Ex Rel. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. City of Muskogee ex rel. Savidge v. MannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. North v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Opinion No. 68-199 (1968) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1968
  5. Wagoner County Election Board v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API