Legal Opinion
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 14, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-0162PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
On March 26, 1993, this Court conducted a hearing to consider whether, as a matter of law, the Financial Institutions Reform and Recovery Act (“FIRREA”) protects the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) from liability for damages caused by repudiation of a non-compete provision. 1 Based on the arguments and authorities presented by the parties in their briefs and during the hearing, the Court found that the non-compete provision could have value prior to repudiation and that the FDIC could be held liable for damages as a result.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner v. DanielsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Occidental Nebraska Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Nashville Lodging Co. v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. S.A.S. AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Source One Mortgage Services Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Beach Tv Properties Inc. v. SolomanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.