Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. S.A.S. Associates
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided April 23, 1999No. 2:97cv1173PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PRINCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case involves the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1821 et seq. (1998). The plaintiffs, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and WRH Mortgage, Inc. (“WRH”), seek a declaratory judgment either allowing them to foreclose on property that the defendant, S.A.S. Associates (“SAS”), owns and used to secure a loan from the plaintiffs’ predecessor, or otherwise requiring SAS to pay the outstanding balance due on that loan. The parties have consented to have a magistrate judge…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. Waller, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. WallerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Acorn Structures, Inc. v. SwantzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Nossen v. HoyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
- Bruce A. Howell v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Eliot Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Bright v. QSP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frank Brunckhorst Co. v. Coastal Atlantic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- WRH Mortgage, Inc. v. S.A.S. AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Wrh Mortgage, Incorporated v. S.A.S. AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Ingrid Jiang v. RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026