Securities & Exchange Commission v. Forster
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) moves for an order requiring the respondent, Michael J. Forster* to comply with a subpoena for documents related to an SEC investigation into possible violations of the - securities laws by Forster and-his various alleged nominees. For the reasons that follow* the motion is denied and the Subpoena, either in its original- or modified form, is quashed without prejudice to the ability of the SEC to serve a proper, subpoena.
*225I.
The SEC is investigating possible violations of the Securities Act of 1933…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Curcio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. HubbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. FridmanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Benthos Master Fund, Ltd. v. EtraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. NawabiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022