Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Forster

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 5, 2015No. 15-mc-246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) moves for an order requiring the respondent, Michael J. Forster* to comply with a subpoena for documents related to an SEC investigation into possible violations of the - securities laws by Forster and-his various alleged nominees. For the reasons that follow* the motion is denied and the Subpoena, either in its original- or modified form, is quashed without prejudice to the ability of the SEC to serve a proper, subpoena.

*225I.

The SEC is investigating possible violations of the Securities Act of 1933…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Curcio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. HubbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. FridmanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Benthos Master Fund, Ltd. v. EtraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  3. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. NawabiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API