Legal Opinion

Wilt ex rel. Guderyahn v. Hartman Trunk Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 27, 1919No. Gen. No. 25,043PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hugh R. Stewart, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

C. J. G-uderyahn obtained a judgment in the Municipal Court against Elmer E. Wilt and Perry Ulrich. An execution was issued on this judgment and returned nulla bona.

One of the defendants in this judgment, Elmer E. Wilt, was an employee of the defendant, The Hartman Trunk Company. This garnishee proceeding was commenced against Wilt’s employer, the affidavit for the garnishee summons setting forth that the judgment was rendered against E. W. Wilt. There was a conditional judgment against defendant by default and a scire facias issued to make it final, to which defendant answered, inter alia,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Siegel, Cooper & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. BlagdenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  3. Cairo & St. Louis Railroad v. KillenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campagna ex rel. Kolarik v. Automatic Electric Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  2. Hudson ex rel. Topp v. Hudson Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Welch v. WelchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API