ADP Investor Communication Services, Inc. v. in House Attorney Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Defendants In House Attorney Services, Inc. (“In House”) and Mr. Craig Osbourne (“Osbourne”) (collectively “Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiff ADP Investor Communication Services, Inc.’s (“ADP”) Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(2). In the alternative, Defendants move this Court to dismiss counts two and three of the Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).
ADP brings three claims: i) breach of contract against In House; ii) unjust enrichment against In House; and in) conversion against both…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- Jonas v. Estate of LevenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Taylor v. BettisDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Watts v. Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Newbro v. FreedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.