Legal Opinion

Smith v. Riker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1987No. 85-58-CV; CA A42207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

In this negligence action, plaintiff appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendant. The dispositive issue is whether ORS 12.155(1) applies to Personal Injury Protection payments (PIP) to require a paying insurer to give written notice of when the applicable tort Statute of Limitations will run. 1 If it does not, plaintiffs action is barred.

On February 1,1983, plaintiff was injured when a car driven by defendant, in which plaintiff was a passenger, collided with a school bus. Defendant was insured under her parents’ State Farm Insurance (State Farm) policy. State Farm paid plaintiff under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duncan v. DubinOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ben Rybke Co. v. Royal Globe InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ben Rybke Co. v. Royal Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weatherspoon v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Meoli v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API