Legal Opinion
Burke v. Vose
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided May 24, 1993No. C.A. 92-0261-TPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TORRES, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy M. Boudewyns filed on April 12, 1993, is accepted pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(B).
The petition for federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied, and the case is dismissed.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BOUDEWYNS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner William Burke (“Burke” or “the petitioner”) seeks federal habeas corpus relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, from his state convictions in 1985 for multiple counts of robbery and other offenses…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Erickson v. Newmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4324, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7041 Donald C. Erickson v. Newmar Corporation, Does I Through X and Doe Corporations I Through X, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996