Legal Opinion
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4324, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7041 Donald C. Erickson v. Newmar Corporation, Does I Through X and Doe Corporations I Through X, Inclusive
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1996No. 94-15726Published
1Opinion of the Court
87 F.3d 298
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4324, 96 Daily Journal
D.A.R. 7041
Donald C. ERICKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NEWMAR CORPORATION, Does I through X and Doe Corporations I
through X, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-15726.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 20, 1995.
Decided June 18, 1996.
Donald C. Erickson, Moapa, Nevada, in pro. per., for plaintiff-appellant.
E. Leslie Combs, Jr., Combs & England, Las Vegas, Nevada, for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Frazier v. HeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Gas-A-Tron of Arizona and Coinoco v. Union Oil Company of California, Petrol Stops Northwest v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.