Legal Opinion

In re the Disbarment of Wilcox

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 28, 1913No. 17,799PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original proceeding in disbarment.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

On the ground that there is no statutory provision for the allowance of costs in disbarment proceedings, the accused asks that no costs be taxed against him. The proceedings were commenced before the enactment of chapter 64 of the Laws of 1913, concerning the disbarment of attorneys, which provides for the taxing of costs against the accused if found guilty, and against the state if he be acquitted. A number of courts have held that in the absence of statutory authority no costs will be allowed to either party in disbarment proceedings.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. In re Watt & DohanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. State v. FisherNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. In re SherinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. In Re CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dinsmore v. BarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API