Legal Opinion

Interdigital Communications, Inc. v. Huawei Investment & Holding Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 23, 2016No. 15-cv-4485 (JGK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:

This action arises out of an arbitration between the petitioner, InterDigital Communications, Inc. and several InterDigital entities (collectively “InterDigital”), and the respondent, Huawei Investment & Holding Co. and several Huawei entities (collectively “Huawei”). The parties spent several years litigating and negotiating a licensing scheme for InterDigital’s patents for 3G and 4G wireless technology. In 2014, the parties agreed to submit to a binding arbitration before an Arbitral Tribunal governed by the Rules of Arbitration of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi NegaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Europcar Italia, S.P.A. v. Maiellano Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi NegaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Fertilizer Corp. of India v. IDI Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
  5. Spier v. Calzaturificio Tecnica S.P.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gretton Limited v. Republic of UzbekistanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  2. Qatar Pharma for Pharmaceutical Industries, W.L.L., et al. v. The Kingdom of Saudi ArabiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API