Legal Opinion

Gretton Limited v. Republic of Uzbekistan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 6, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-1755Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GRETTON LTD., Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 18-1755 (JEB) REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Gretton Ltd. seeks to enforce a foreign arbitral award assessed against the Republic of Uzbekistan. Gretton itself, however, never had any direct dealings with Uzbekistan. Rather, the dispute arose between the Central Asian country and a company called Oxus Gold, PLC over Oxus’s investments in two gold-mining operations there. Although the underlying Award is still working its way through direct-appeal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Foster v. ChatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Belize Social Development Ltd. v. Government of BelizeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API