Gretton Limited v. Republic of Uzbekistan
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GRETTON LTD., Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 18-1755 (JEB) REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Gretton Ltd. seeks to enforce a foreign arbitral award assessed against the Republic of Uzbekistan. Gretton itself, however, never had any direct dealings with Uzbekistan. Rather, the dispute arose between the Central Asian country and a company called Oxus Gold, PLC over Oxus’s investments in two gold-mining operations there. Although the underlying Award is still working its way through direct-appeal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foster v. ChatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Belize Social Development Ltd. v. Government of BelizeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.