Legal Opinion
Schade v. Maryland State Board of Elections
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 24, 2007No. 64, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.
The instant matter finds its genesis in a challenge brought by several registered Maryland voters and candidates for public office, collectively, “the appellants,” to the decision of the Maryland State Board of Elections (“the State Board”), one of the appellees, 1 to purchase and certify, pursuant to Maryland Code (2003) §§ 9-101 2 and 9-102 3 of the Election Law Article (“EL”), the Diebold AccuYote-TS (“Diebold”) direct recording electronic (“DRE”) voting system for use in the November 2, 2004 elections. Specifically, the appellants, plaintiffs below, citing vulnerabilities in the system’s…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Direx Israel, Ltd. Direx, Incorporated v. Breakthrough Medical Corporation Zvi Porath Avner SpectorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Bush v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ecri, a Nonprofit Pennsylvania Corporation v. McGraw Inc., McGraw Information Systems Co., and McGraw Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Andrade v. NAACP of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Wilson-X v. Department of Human Resources Ex Rel. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Figgins v. CochraneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Griffin v. BiermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Webb v. NowakCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.