Legal Opinion

Andrade v. NAACP of Austin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2011No. 09-0420PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

Technology is changing the way we vote. It has not eliminated controversy about the way votes are recorded and verified. We must decide whether voters have standing to pursue complaints about an electronic voting machine that does not produce a contemporaneous paper record of each vote. Because we conclude that most of the voters’ allegations involve generalized grievances about the lawfulness of government acts, and because their remaining claims fail on their merits, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and render judgment dismissing the case.

I. Background

Voters in different parts of…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Finance Commission v. NorwoodTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Klumb v. Houston Municipal Employees Pension SystemTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Stanley Bacon, Jr. v. Texas Historical Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API